The closest to Krita is CSP and if Krita can get to how csp handles their text and objects I think by that point it will be more than adequate. That is why the vector thing should start small but be able to grow health from that point on by knowing what will come ahead. I did a vector brush engine feature request that was the essencial tools for the rest to come after. Just asking for every option you want straight away will take years and years for any company let alone open source.ĭespite the objectives of Krita this is a tool with so much potential I feel most people don’t see because how it is presented to people.
There will come a time where just illustration for artists will be a section and there will be people doing other stuff with it. Making more rival applications than PS and CSP. This to say vector is a path to another world, and for now illustration and animation would greatly be increased by it because. CSP and other Animation uses it hiden from users and ignoring it not a good move. Users are just ussually oblivious of its existence. Vector having a more prevelant space would solve bunch of problems in a simple and efficient way after and allow growth.Īlso vector in Krita is better than in inkscape for me already. I always thought PS and AI should have been the same program and Krita does that merge and it is amazing and it has the Calligraphy tool already. it just needs to be tackled a bit different or have a derivative engine to be different a bit.įor animation I think there is bigger needs still than vector. Even though it would be big with it.īut the attitude presented in this thread is useless as a rock for how much I may agree with the ideas. Your just another list amoung others with also valid reasons… If your not investing with money or the time to improve it. Honestly I have no clue what will happen next.These will often include the application, an arrow, and a shortcut for the Applications folder.
0 kommentar(er)
